Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Nature ; 610(7932): 540-546, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2084529

ABSTRACT

The spread of antibiotic resistance is attracting increased attention to combination-based treatments. Although drug combinations have been studied extensively for their effects on bacterial growth1-11, much less is known about their effects on bacterial long-term clearance, especially at cidal, clinically relevant concentrations12-14. Here, using en masse microplating and automated image analysis, we systematically quantify Staphylococcus aureus survival during prolonged exposure to pairwise and higher-order cidal drug combinations. By quantifying growth inhibition, early killing and longer-term population clearance by all pairs of 14 antibiotics, we find that clearance interactions are qualitatively different, often showing reciprocal suppression whereby the efficacy of the drug mixture is weaker than any of the individual drugs alone. Furthermore, in contrast to growth inhibition6-10 and early killing, clearance efficacy decreases rather than increases as more drugs are added. However, specific drugs targeting non-growing persisters15-17 circumvent these suppressive effects. Competition experiments show that reciprocal suppressive drug combinations select against resistance to any of the individual drugs, even counteracting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus both in vitro and in a Galleria mellonella larva model. As a consequence, adding a ß-lactamase inhibitor that is commonly used to potentiate treatment against ß-lactam-resistant strains can reduce rather than increase treatment efficacy. Together, these results underscore the importance of systematic mapping the long-term clearance efficacy of drug combinations for designing more-effective, resistance-proof multidrug regimes.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Staphylococcus aureus , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors/pharmacology , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , Drug Combinations , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/cytology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Microbial/drug effects , Drug Synergism
2.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 1237, 2022 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1730289

ABSTRACT

The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to reduce viral load of breakthrough infections (BTIs), an important factor affecting infectiousness. This viral-load protective effect has been waning with time post the second vaccine and later restored with a booster shot. It is currently unclear though for how long this regained effectiveness lasts. Analyzing Ct values of SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR tests of over 22,000 infections during a Delta-variant-dominant period in Israel, we find that this viral-load reduction effectiveness significantly declines within months post the booster dose. Adjusting for age, sex and calendric date, Ct values of RdRp gene initially increases by 2.7 [CI: 2.3-3.0] relative to unvaccinated in the first month post the booster dose, yet then decays to a difference of 1.3 [CI: 0.7-1.9] in the second month and becomes small and insignificant in the third to fourth months. The rate and magnitude of this post-booster decline in viral-load reduction effectiveness mirror those observed post the second vaccine. These results suggest rapid waning of the booster's effectiveness in reducing infectiousness, possibly affecting community-level spread of the virus.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Immunization, Secondary/methods , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Viral Load/immunology , Adult , Algorithms , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Immunization, Secondary/statistics & numerical data , Immunogenicity, Vaccine/immunology , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination/methods , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Mol Diagn ; 24(2): 112-119, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1641441

ABSTRACT

Quantifying the detection rate of the widely used quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and its dependence on patient demographic characteristics and disease progression is key in designing epidemiologic strategies. Analyzing 843,917 test results of 521,696 patients, a "positive period" was defined for each patient between diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 and the last positive test result. The fraction of positive test results within this period was then used to estimate detection rate. Regression analyses were used to determine associations of detection with time of sampling after diagnosis, patient demographic characteristics, and viral RNA copy number based on RT-qPCR cycle threshold values of the next positive test result. The overall detection rate in tests performed within 14 days after diagnosis was 83.1%. This rate was higher at days 0 to 5 after diagnosis (89.3%). Furthermore, detection rate was strongly associated with age and sex. Finally, the detection rate with the Allplex 2019-nCoV RT-qPCR kit was associated, at the single-patient level, with viral RNA copy number (P < 10-9). These results show that the reliability of the test result is reduced in later days as well as for women and younger patients, in whom the viral loads are typically lower.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adult , Age Factors , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , RNA, Viral , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Viral Load , Young Adult
4.
Nat Med ; 27(12): 2108-2110, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1500482

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing disease and reducing viral loads of breakthrough infections (BTIs) has been decreasing, concomitantly with the rise of the Delta variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is unclear whether the observed decreased effectiveness of the vaccine in reducing viral loads is inherent to the Delta variant or is dependent on time from immunization. By analyzing viral loads of over 16,000 infections during the current, Delta-variant-dominated pandemic wave in Israel, we found that BTIs in recently fully vaccinated individuals have lower viral loads than infections in unvaccinated individuals. However, this effect starts to decline 2 months after vaccination and ultimately vanishes 6 months or longer after vaccination. Notably, we found that the effect of BNT162b2 on reducing BTI viral loads is restored after a booster dose. These results suggest that BNT162b2 might decrease the infectiousness of BTIs even with the Delta variant, and that, although this protective effect declines with time, it can be restored, at least temporarily, with a third, booster, vaccine dose.


Subject(s)
BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Viral Load , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Viral/blood , BNT162 Vaccine/administration & dosage , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Time Factors , Vaccination/methods
5.
Nat Med ; 27(8): 1367-1369, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1265965

ABSTRACT

Mass vaccination has the potential to curb the current COVID-19 pandemic by protecting individuals who have been vaccinated against the disease and possibly lowering the likelihood of transmission to individuals who have not been vaccinated. The high effectiveness of the widely administered BNT162b vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech in preventing not only the disease but also infection with SARS-CoV-2 suggests a potential for a population-level effect, which is critical for disease eradication. However, this putative effect is difficult to observe, especially in light of highly fluctuating spatiotemporal epidemic dynamics. Here, by analyzing vaccination records and test results collected during the rapid vaccine rollout in a large population from 177 geographically defined communities, we find that the rates of vaccination in each community are associated with a substantial later decline in infections among a cohort of individuals aged under 16 years, who are unvaccinated. On average, for each 20 percentage points of individuals who are vaccinated in a given population, the positive test fraction for the unvaccinated population decreased approximately twofold. These results provide observational evidence that vaccination not only protects individuals who have been vaccinated but also provides cross-protection to unvaccinated individuals in the community.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/virology , Humans
6.
Nat Med ; 27(5): 790-792, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1157912

ABSTRACT

Beyond their substantial protection of individual vaccinees, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines might reduce viral load in breakthrough infection and thereby further suppress onward transmission. In this analysis of a real-world dataset of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test results after inoculation with the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine, we found that the viral load was substantially reduced for infections occurring 12-37 d after the first dose of vaccine. These reduced viral loads hint at a potentially lower infectiousness, further contributing to vaccine effect on virus spread.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccination , Viral Load , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/virology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Young Adult
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(16): 2073-2078, 2020 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1153155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recent emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) led to a current pandemic of unprecedented scale. Although diagnostic tests are fundamental to the ability to detect and respond, overwhelmed healthcare systems are already experiencing shortages of reagents associated with this test, calling for a lean immediately applicable protocol. METHODS: RNA extracts of positive samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, alone or in pools of different sizes (2-, 4-, 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-sample pools) with negative samples. Transport media of additional 3 positive samples were also tested when mixed with transport media of negative samples in pools of 8. RESULTS: A single positive sample can be detected in pools of up to 32 samples, using the standard kits and protocols, with an estimated false negative rate of 10%. Detection of positive samples diluted in even up to 64 samples may also be attainable, although this may require additional amplification cycles. Single positive samples can be detected when pooling either after or prior to RNA extraction. CONCLUSIONS: As it uses the standard protocols, reagents, and equipment, this pooling method can be applied immediately in current clinical testing laboratories. We hope that such implementation of a pool test for coronavirus disease 2019 would allow expanding current screening capacities, thereby enabling the expansion of detection in the community, as well as in close organic groups, such as hospital departments, army units, or factory shifts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL